Evolutionary Potential
The Trend of Engineering System Evolution (TESE) or Evolutionary Potential (EP) is a widely adopted tool within the framework of the Theory of Inventive Problem-Solving (TRIZ). Due to its applicability across diverse domains, TESE has found widespread use in real-world projects, contributing to the development of engineering products and the anticipation of emerging technologies. It is a tool for inventiveness and the identification of future engineering systems, and it continues to evolve its own body of knowledge through applications to become a comprehensive in terms of its practical utility in the realm of product innovation. TESE/EP, the trend of engineering system evolution, functions as a heuristic and predictive toolkit capable of yielding either market pull through the analysis of S-curves or technology push through its sub-trends. The examination of the evolution paths of technical systems has been a fundamental research approach within TRIZ since its inception. However, it wasn’t until the 1970s that the identified recurrent patterns of evolution were systematically consolidated into a dedicated section of TRIZ. Genrich Altshuller, the founder of TRIZ, named this section “the laws of technical systems evolution.” This section encompassed both previously identified recurring evolution patterns and newly discovered ones. In the 1970s, Altshuller took the initiative to bring together these patterns, creating a cohesive framework for understanding the evolution of technical systems. The study of these “laws of evolution” emerged as an independent and significant research topic within TRIZ. Several key contributors, in addition to Altshuller, played vital roles in advancing this field. Many believe that the TRIZ trend component is one of the system’s most potent components. The trend offers a gradual progression (which shows evolution in phases) in the direction of rising ideality. Technology trends serve two main purposes: first, as a tool to predict how systems will evolve strategically, and second, as a tool to aid in issue solving. The trend works in a left-to-right fashion with evident certainty, as observed in many examples, making it easy to accept it as the direction of evolution. This is mostly based on information gleaned from knowledge databases and patent databases. The reasoning behind the justification of the direction is that “somewhere there is a benefit from evolving from left to right along the trend” and that this also helps achieve an increase in ideality. Laws of Technical System Evolution However, in his work in 1975, Genrich Altshuller categorized all laws of technical systems evolution into three distinct categories: 1: Statics: This category focuses on the criteria that determine the viability of newly created technical systems. It deals with the foundational principles that assess the stability and functionality of systems at their inception. 2: Kinematics: The laws falling under this category define the general principles that govern how technical systems evolve, regardless of specific conditions. Kinematics in this context addresses the overarching dynamics and trends in the evolution of technical systems. 3: Dynamics: This category is concerned with how technical systems evolve under specific conditions. Unlike the more general principles covered in Kinematics, Dynamics delves into the detailed and context-specific aspects of system evolution, considering the influence of external factors and conditions. 1. Law of the Completeness of the Parts of the System (Statics): A functional system is comprised of four essential parts, each serving a specific role: Engine: Generates necessary energy. Transmission: Guides and directs energy flow. Working Unit (Working Organ): Interfaces with the external world or processed object. and Control Element (Organ of Steering): Ensures adaptability and control. This law emphasizes the necessity for a comprehensive set of components in a system to ensure its proper functioning and adaptability. (keywords: wholeness of system) 2. Law of Energy Conductivity of the System (Static): Recognizing that every technical system transforms energy, this law emphasizes the importance of efficient and unrestricted circulation of energy through the four main components (engine, transmission, working element, and control element). Energy can be transferred through substance, field, or a combination of both (substance-field). There is a neeed to ensures the smooth flow and utilization of energy within the system. (keywords: conductible energy flow) 3. Law of Harmonizing the Rhythms of Parts of the System (Static): Focuses on achieving synchronization in the frequencies of vibration or periodicity among the different parts and movements of the system. Aims to create harmony and coordination among the various components, preventing conflicts or inefficiencies caused by discordant rhythms. (keywords: coordination, harmonization) 4. Law of Increasing the Degree of Ideality of the System (Kinematics): The ideality of a system is a qualitative measure of the ratio between all desirable benefits of the system and its cost or negative effects. This law suggests that in the pursuit of improving an invention, there is a natural inclination to increase ideality by either enhancing beneficial features, reducing costs, or minimizing harmful effects. Although achieving a state of zero cost for all benefits is not feasible, successive versions of technical designs typically increase ideality over time. Formula: Ideality = Benefits / (Cost + Harm). Keywords: Degree of idealness 5. Law of Uneven Development of Parts of a System (Kinematics): Acknowledges that different parts of a technical system will evolve at varying rates, leading to the emergence of new technical and physical contradictions. This law highlights the importance of recognizing and addressing disparities in the development of system components. Alerts to potential conflicts or challenges arising from uneven evolution within a system. Keywords: Unequal development of parts 6. Law of Transition to a Super-System (Kinematics): When a system reaches the limits of significant improvement, it is incorporated into a super-system as one of its parts. This integration into a larger context opens up new possibilities for the development of the original system. Recognizes the finite nature of individual system improvement and suggests a pathway for continued development through integration into a larger framework. 7. Transition from Macro to Micro Level (Dynamics) : The development of working organs within technical systems initially occurs on a macro level and then progresses to a micro level. This transition from macro to micro is identified as a significant, if not the primary, tendency in the advancement of modern










