Research For Distance Education (415)
Block 1 : Introduction to Research in Distance Education Unit 1: Introduction to Educational Research: Purpose , Nature and Scope Sources of Knowledge 1.3 Purpose of Research 1.3.1 Training and Research 1.3.2 Problem Solving 1.3.3 Search for Truth: Scientific Inquiry and Theory Development 1.4 Nature of Research 1.4.1 Characteristics of Research 1.4.2 Types of Research 1.4.3 Meaning of Educational Research 1.4.4 Scientific Approach in Educational Research 1.5 Scope of Educational Research 1.5.1 Methodological Classification 1.5.2 Area-wise Classification In deductive reasoning, the investigator proceeds from general to specific statements. In inductive reasoning, the argument and strength is derived from the observed phenomena. Both deductive and inductive reasoning have made significant contribution towards developing a systematic approach to establish truth. Deductive reasoning is a thinking process in which one proceeds from general to specific statements, through logical arguments. Inductive reasoning derives its argument and strength from the observed phenomena. Scientific approach is generally described as a process in which investigators move inductively from their observations to hypotheses and then deductively from the hypotheses to the logical implications of the hypotheses. This approach, or ‘research’ as source of information, has been increasingly used to prepare strategies and arrive at definite conclusions. As research systematically describes or measures reality in an objective way, it is a better source of knowledge, than one’s own experience, customs and traditions, deductive or inductive reasoning. The second purpose of research is diagnosing and solving the problems in the system. In this case, the system is distance education. Search for truth is the biggest challenge in research. Research in search of truth is often classified as pure research in the otherwise controversial pure- applied research continuum. The search for truth, from the angle of research, is the ability to generalize and thus, create knowledge. Such generalizations are derived from occurrences in repeated instances Scientific enquiry starts with facts and then moves towards theorizing. To be useful, facts must be organized, and the primary purpose of the scientific method is to develop a mechanism of organizing the facts, as they accumulate, and become meaningful from the stand point of their objectives. Through empirical investigations, scientists gather many facts. As these facts accumulate, there is a need for integration, organization, and classification in order to make the isolated findings meaningful. Significant relationship in the data must be identified and explained. In other words, theories must be formulated. Theory may be defined as “a set of interrelated constructs (concepts), definitions and propositions that present a systematic view of a phenomena by specifying relations among variables, with the purpose of predicting and explaining the phenomena” (Kerlinger, 1973). A hypothesis, when accepted, explains a small number of facts and the relationship between them. Generalization, as the term denotes, is a hypothesis based on broader phenomena. Theory, explains even more facts and their inter-relations. Theories themselves range from the simple to the more sophisticated. Finally there are laws, which have the greatest scope and generality. There are several purposes to be served by a theory in the development of science. We shall briefly consider three of them here. First, theory summarizes and puts in order the existing knowledge in a particular area. It permits deeper understanding of data and translates empirical findings into a more easily retainable and adaptable form. The theory of oxidation for instance, places into focus many of the chemical reactions common to everyday life. Secondly, theory provides a provisional explanation for observed events and relationships. It identifies the variables that are related and the nature of their relationship. A theory of learning, for example, could explain the relationship between the speed and efficiency of learning and such other variables as motivation, reward and practice. Lastly, theory permits the prediction of the occurrence of phenomena and enables the investigator to postulate and, eventually, to discover hitherto unknown phenomena. A theory is built upon collected facts. The investigator then searches, makes intelligent guesses as to how the facts are ordered, adds missing ideas or links, and puts forward a hypothesis; deduces what consequence should follow from the hypothesis and looks for further facts which are consistent or otherwise with the deductions; builds a wider generalization or conceptual framework on more facts; and eventually outlines a theory. Theories are solidly based on evidence. And they are important practical tools which enable us to advance our knowledge still further. Once a theoretical framework has been elaborated we know what facts to look for to confirm or to deny the theory; also, we have a conceptual framework inside with which our evidence can be tested. We may think of six levels of theorizing, which we briefly discuss below. Level 1. Hypothesis formation: This is the level of hypothesis formation. Any hypothesis which is to be used as a basis for research goes beyond the facts on which it is based. The purpose is to establish the existing state of affairs. Nearly all surveys are conducted for this purpose. Thus, students of education may conduct a survey of what the pupils think of a particular aspect of the curriculum; how much time is spent by pupils in watching television, etc. Direct study of aspects is probably the simplest to undertake though this does not mean that it is easy to plan and execute Level 2. Elementism: Examples of theories at this level are primitive forms of classification in terms of some significant set of ideas or idea. In the case of education and distance education, classification of abilities derived from factor analysis, or the classification of teaching acts that may be the result of extensive classroom observation, would come under the level of elementism. Level 3. Descriptive theories and taxonomies: Formulation of descriptive theories and taxonomies occurs at a more complex level than mere classification. An example of theorizing at this level is the taxonomy of human learning provided by Gagne. Gagne classified learning into eight different categories, which vary from the most simple to the most complex. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive behaviours can also be placed under this level. Level 4. Classification: For development of any kind of useful classificatory system, there is a need for a set of theoretical ideas to underlie the classification. The classification of animals acquired significance only after it was realized that, the species could be fitted into a system in which the evolutionary relationships between animals became the basis for classification. Although the concept of evolution became a basis for systematic classification of living creatures the theory of evolution itself represents theory construction at a higher









